Legal Opinion

Kupperberg v. American Druggists Syndicate, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 13, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, J.:

The action is brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case defendant’s counsel moved to dismiss on the ground that no negligence had been shown and the plaintiff had failed to establish facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. The court reserved decision on this motion. At the conclusion of the entire evidence, this motion was renewed and granted.

Plaintiff’s counsel asked to have the case submitted to the jury on the question of negligence and freedom…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Knapp v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Barker v. . SavageNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Baker v. . CloseNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Buhrens v. Dry-Dock, East Broadway & Battery Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1889
  5. O'Neill v. EwertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Floyd v. LipkaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
  2. Reier v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Bennett v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Nazinitsky v. SincoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. Wood v. PaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API