Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Lipka

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 25, 1959No. 52, 1958PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bramhall, J.:

This appeal is concerned with the question of whether a minor plaintiff, about to cross a street intersection after looking before entering the street and again looking when she stepped off the curb, was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law for failing to look thereafter.

Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the facts are substantially as follows: At about seven o’clock in the evening of November 4, 1955, the minor plaintiff, a young girl twelve years of age (plaintiff), and a girl friend were returning home from the drugstore…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Legum v. State Ex Rel. MoranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  2. Newman v. Protective Motor Service Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Rhinehart v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  4. Weidner v. OtterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Harker v. GruhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Anglo American Security Fund, L.P. v. S.R. Global International Fund, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
  2. Stenta v. LeblangSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  3. Frelick v. Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
  4. Yankanwich v. WhartonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  5. Beck v. HaleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API