Floyd v. Lipka
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Bramhall, J.:
This appeal is concerned with the question of whether a minor plaintiff, about to cross a street intersection after looking before entering the street and again looking when she stepped off the curb, was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law for failing to look thereafter.
Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the facts are substantially as follows: At about seven o’clock in the evening of November 4, 1955, the minor plaintiff, a young girl twelve years of age (plaintiff), and a girl friend were returning home from the drugstore…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Legum v. State Ex Rel. MoranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
- Newman v. Protective Motor Service Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Rhinehart v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Weidner v. OtterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Harker v. GruhlIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Anglo American Security Fund, L.P. v. S.R. Global International Fund, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2003
- Stenta v. LeblangSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Frelick v. Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 1959
- Yankanwich v. WhartonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Beck v. HaleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.