Legal Opinion

Nazinitsky v. Sincoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 23, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff Rose Nazinitsky, by reason of alleged negligence of the defendant in the operation of an automobile, and by the plaintiff Rebecca Nazinitsky for loss of services and expenses, judgment for defendant dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. The testimony adduced on behalf of the plaintiffs is to the effect that both infant plaintiffs proceeded across Pitkin avenue at a time when the lights were in their favor and that they had proceeded…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kupperberg v. American Druggists Syndicate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  2. D'Alcamo v. GoldbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Counihan v. J. H. Werbelovsky's Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Martha Deliantis and Daphne Zirpiades v. United States of America, Kuja Kariskakis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API