Glidden & Joy Varnish Co. v. Interstate Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. This suit was brought by the Interstate National Bank of Kansas City, Kan., the defendant in error, against the Glidden & Joy Varnish Company, the plaintiff in error, an Ohio corporation, on four promissory notes (one dated May 6, 1893, for $3,000; one dated May 29, 1893, for $2,000; one dated June 16, 1S93, for $2,000; and one dated July 1,1893, .for $3,000), each due 90 days after…
Read the full summary
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. This suit was brought by the Interstate National Bank of Kansas City, Kan., the defendant in error, against the Glidden & Joy Varnish Company, the plaintiff in error, an Ohio corporation, on four promissory notes (one dated May 6, 1893, for $3,000; one dated May 29, 1893, for $2,000; one dated June 16, 1S93, for $2,000; and one dated July 1,1893, .for $3,000), each due 90 days after date, and signed, “The Glidden & Joy Varnish Company, Geo. E. Dudley, Treas.” These notes are renewals of notes originally…
1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, Circuit Judge
Waiving the technical objections to the sufficiency in form of the exceptions taken at the trial and of the assignments of error in the brief, we will proceed to dispose of the case on its merits.
For some reason, which we are unable to comprehend, objections were taken all through the trial to the introduction of all evidence tending to show that it was the Ohio, and not the Missouri, corporation that was doing business at Kansas City after January, 1891. Objection was also taken to all evidence tending to show that Dudley had authority, as manager of the Ohio company’s Kansas City branch, to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
- Moore v. H. Gaus & Sons Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Merchants' National Bank v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Helena National Bank v. Rocky Mountain Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
- Pacific Can Co. v. HewesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Clere Clothing Co. v. Union Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
- Petition of Mulco ProductsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1956
- American Nat. Bank v. National Wall-Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.