Legal Opinion

Pacific Can Co. v. Hewes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 2, 1938No. 8487PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

From a judgment for $21,523.73, rendered in favor of appellee, in an action brought by him to recover from appellant for fruit delivered by appellee to Cleary Packing Company, appellant has appealed.

The C. & H. Packing Company, Inc., a Washington corporation, engaged in a canning business, became financially involved in 1934, and it was doubtful whether or not it wpuld be able to operate during the 1935 canning season. Appellant, a Nevada corporation, engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of cans, wrote C. & H. Packing Company, Inc., on April 30, 1935 in part…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Berkey v. Third Avenue Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Best v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Kingston Dry Dock Co. v. Lake Champlain Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. In re Watertown Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Luckett v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  3. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Japan Petroleum Co.(Nigeria) Ltd. v. Ashland OilDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API