Legal Opinion
Petition of Mulco Products
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided May 1, 1956No. 261PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Terry, J.:
At the hearing I considered the petitioner’s testimony sufficient to require the opening of the judgment, ordered the same opened and proceeded to hear and determine the issues. I shall now set forth the material facts which I consider to be established by a fair preponderance of the evidence.
Hereinafter I shall refer to the petitioner, John H. Mulhol-land Co. (which later became the Welch Manufacturing Company, and is now Mulco Products, Inc.) as “corporation”, to the respondent, Howard W. Black, as “Black”, to Harry H. Mulhol-land, Sr., president of the corporation, as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Povey v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Helena National Bank v. Rocky Mountain Telegraph Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
- Joseph Greenspon's Sons Iron & Steel Co. v. Pecos Valley Gas Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1931
- Watson v. Proximity Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Ingalls & Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tracinda Corp. v. Daimlerchrysler AgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23942h Frank C. Schoonejongen Wesley L. Losson John S. Dunning William Martone William v. Hanzalek Edward F. Ziek Melvin Deblock Joseph Colquhoun Joseph Majerscak Gerard Abbamont and Olga Wolsey, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Curtiss-Wright CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
- Bernard J. Lee, Platiff-Appellant v. Jenkins Brothers, Bernard J. Lee v. Farnham YardleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Fields v. Synthetic Ropes, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1965
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.