Legal Opinion
Watkins v. Leyba
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 24, 2008No. 07-1222PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER *
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Robert Watkins, a Colorado state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) in order to challenge the district court’s dismissal of his habeas petition. The district court dismissed his petition without prejudice because he failed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund statement as directed by the magistrate judge. Mr. Watkins also seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a). Reviewing Mr. Watkins’s filings liberally, 1 we conclude that he failed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- James M. Debardeleben v. J.M. Quinlan, R.L. Matthews, N.W. Smith, R.G. Simpson, E. Cave, and W.A. BlountCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Howard v. United States Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Wishneski v. AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. LedesmaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Jackson v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Tal v. Harth (In Re Harth)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. DuranCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.