Kendall v. Parker
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after appellant’s demurrer had been overruled, appellant standing upon his demurrer.
The complaint is upon a promissory note which is non-negotiable, because it contains a stipulation for an *321attorney’s fee. Suit is brought by the assignee of the first assignee against the makers and the payee as indorser.
The complaint avers that Hill assigned the note by writing his name upon the back thereof, and by delivering the same to the Huntington-Hopkins Company before the maturity of the note.
The Huntington-Hopkins Company, upon the maturity of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First National Bank v. FalkenhanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hamilton v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kinsel v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Lower Tule River Ditch Co. v. Angiola Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Pattee Plow Co. v. Beard.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Newer v. First Nat. Bank of HarlemMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Roads v. WebbSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.