Legal Opinion
Carley v. Gentry
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided October 16, 2019No. 2:17-cv-02670Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 ELIZABETH CARLEY, 5 Plaintiffs, 6 2:17-cv-02670-MMD-VCF vs. ORDER 7 JO GENTRY, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF NO. 46) and Plaintiff’s Motion 11 for Enlargement of Time in Which to File Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery 12 (ECF NO. 49). The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF NO. 13 50). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ motion (ECF NO. 46) is granted. 14 LEGAL STANDARD 15 When evaluating a motion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tradebay, LLC v. eBay, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Michael R. Wood, Individually and Dba National Photo Services v. Willard W. McEwen Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Joseph Rae v. Union Bank, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.