Legal Opinion

Baker v. Baker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 5, 1963No. 40165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

The question to be determined in this appeal is whether to affirm the trial court’s refusal to permit the plaintiff to reopen the case after conclusion of taking of testimony and to testify as to certain of defendant’s physical (manly) characteristics. Reference to the parties is made here as in the trial court.

The facts as developed at the trial were that in the summer of 1952, plaintiff and defendant commenced living- together at the defendant’s ranch in Osage County, Oklahoma; that, while, plaintiff and defendant were residing in Utah, plaintiff, on November 7, 1953, gave…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Woolfolk v. SemrodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. Tuck v. BullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  4. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. City of Shawnee v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. CT Hughes Construction Company v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Swyden v. KilliamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API