Legal Opinion

Bank of Hawaii & Royal Indemnity Co. v. Char

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1954No. 2852PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a hill for foreclosure of mortgages, for appointment of a receiver to complete construction of a public road, for subrogation affecting mortgagee and surety under an indemnity agreement between them and the payment of creditors’ claims against surety’s indemnity bond to the Territory conditioned on the faithful performance of a road construction contract, for adjustment of rights, duties and liabilities between mortgagee, surety, mortgagors, principals and contractors and for other relief incidental thereto. It is brought by the petitioners, Bank of Hawaii, as mortgagee, and Boyal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. In Re the Guardianship of WardHawaii Supreme Court · 1951
  3. State v. ChodosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Tax Appeal of Hawaiian Land Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Okuhara v. BroidaHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Bank of Hawaii v. CharHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
  5. In Re the Estate of CampbellHawaii Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API