AT&T Corp. v. Voip-Pal.com, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 AT&T CORP., et al., Case No. 20-CV-02995-LHK 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 DISMISS v. 14 Re: Dkt. No. 76 VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiffs AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., and AT&T Mobility (collectively, “AT&T”) 18 sue Defendant VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“Defendant”) for a declaration of non-infringement and 19 invalidity of
U.S. Patent No. 10,218,606
(“the ’606 patent”). Before the Court is Defendant’s 20 motion to dismiss AT&T’s complaint, ECF No. 76. Having…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Leadsinger, Inc. v. BMG Music PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.