Legal Opinion
State v. Lyons
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1990No. CR-90-0262-PRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Chief Justice.
The State petitioned this court to determine whether the court of appeals erred when it remanded the case to the trial court to consider the validity of imposing lifetime probation under A.R.S. § 13-604.01(1) in light of our decision earlier this year in State v. Wagstaff, 164 Ariz. 485, 794 P.2d 118 (1990). Because this issue is of statewide significance, we granted review to determine the constitutionality of this provision. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
*16FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Jeffrey Howard Lyons…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Smith v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- State v. WagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MarquezArizona Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State ex rel. Polk v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Romaine v. ShinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.