Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Department

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1984No. 17294-PRPublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.

The appellants filed an action against the Pima County Adult Probation Department, four named adult probation officers, the State of Arizona, and Pima County for damages for personal injuries suffered as a result of the allegedly negligent supervision of one Jesse Christopher, a probationer under the supervision of the Pima County Adult Probation Department. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of all the appellees and the Court of Appeals affirmed, ruling that the probation officers were immune from liability. Acevedo v. Pima County Adult Probation Dept.,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Ryan v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Douglas Gregory v. John J. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Hertog v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. HERTOG, EX REL., SAH v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Taggart v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Bishop v. MicheWashington Supreme Court · 1999

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API