People v. Manhattan Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Ex parte motion before the general term by the. Manhattan Railway Company, for leave to enter an order made by J udge Donohue from which an appeal had been taken. Also a motion that the court fix a day when the appeal could be heard prior to the regular October term, and if not to grant a stay of the motion for a receiver until the appeal could be heard and determined.
Read the full summary
Ex parte motion before the general term by the. Manhattan Railway Company, for leave to enter an order made by J udge Donohue from which an appeal had been taken. Also a motion that the court fix a day when the appeal could be heard prior to the regular October term, and if not to grant a stay of the motion for a receiver until the appeal could be heard and determined. The action was brought to enjoin the corporation from doing any further business, to dissolve it, and to appoint a receiver. An order to show cause was granted returnable at the special term on May 27, why a receiver should not…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.*
This is an ex parte application for an order staying the plaintiff’s proceedings in the action until an appeal from an order of the court below denying an application for such a stay until the decision of a motion to make the complaint more definite and. certain can be heard, and decided by this court; arid also from an order directing the court below to enter the order of the court which denied the motion for a stay of proceedings.
It appears that the motion to reform the complaint and make it more definite and certain is still pending and undecided before the special term, and it…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Friedland v. FriedlandNew York Supreme Court · 1958