Legal Opinion

Bohland v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided April 18, 1947No. 712-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Inasmuch as there is no dispute about the facts, the court can determine this motion upon the pleadings without the introduction of evidence.

Defendant William Smith was convicted in this court and is now confined in the United States Penitentiary at Terre. Haute. Service of summons herein was made upon him by serving, at the family residence, his wife as provided in Section *3654(d) of Civil Rules of Procedure, 28 U.S. C.A. following section 723c. The sole question involved is whether it can be said that his absence from his home, brought about by his incarceration, brings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rovinski v. RoweCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  2. McFadden v. ShoreDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Wendel v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shurman v. Atlantic Mortg. & Inv. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v. AbagnaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Shaffer v. TepperDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1955
  4. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. ChangDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
  5. James v. Russell F. Davis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API