Legal Opinion
Wendel v. Hoffman
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 15, 1938No. 6245PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
The petition to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint is based upon two grounds. First, it is contended that Wendel is a resident of New Jersey and not New York, and, hence, the prerequisite, diversity of citizenship, is lacking. Secondly, objection is made that the complaint is not verified.
Evidence relating to the domicile of Wendel was taken before a Special Master. This evidence is supplemented by affidavits.
From the facts submitted it appears that Wendel continuously resided in Trenton, New Jersey, from 1896 to the fall of 1935 at which time he was dispossessed of his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marks v. MarksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1896
- Millett v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Bjornquist v. Boston & A. R.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918
- People v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Granite Trading Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
3Cited by7 opinions
- Orville E. Stifel, II v. William F. Hopkins, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Sylvester Jones v. J. Martin HadicanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Bohland v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1947
- Chris-Mac Co. v. JohnpollCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985
- James v. Russell F. Davis, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.