Legal Opinion

Pogreba v. O'Brien

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 11, 1947No. 34,331PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

This was a suit for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of defendants’ hotel at Grand Rapids. The cause was duly heard and tried by the trial judge, who made findings favorable to defendants. Plaintiffs’ alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial was denied, and they appeal.

The facts found, and not in substantial dispute, are these: On September 1, 1944, plaintiff Anton Pogreba and defendant George H. O’Brien entered into a written agreement under the terms of which the latter’s hotel, “together with all furniture, fixtures and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. KalmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Breen v. MayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Sawyer v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Gassert v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. New England Mutual Life Insurance v. Mannheimer Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nodland v. ChirpichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Craigmile v. SorensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Wanshura v. State Farm Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Cooke v. BelzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. W.M., R.W., & T.R. Bowler v. TMG PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API