W.M., R.W., & T.R. Bowler v. TMG Partnership
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
This is an appeal by the vendor of real estate, TMG Partnership, from a judgment of the trial court that the vendee, Bowler, a partnership, was entitled to return of earnest money he paid pursuant to a purchase agreement. We affirm.
FACTS
TMG owned a small shopping center in Edina. Bowler contacted Steve Larson, a listing agent for Thorpe Bros, and negotiated a purchase agreement for the property. The agreement contained the following provision.
*110This agreement is contingent upon the Buyers conducting a physical inspection of said building. Buyers will have 10 business days…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shaughnessy v. EidsmoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Nodland v. ChirpichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Pogreba v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947