Two Clinton Square Corp. v. Friedler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, with costs to respondents, in accordance with the following memorandum: The parties have been before our court on four previous appeals concerning various aspects of continuing litigation arising from the same transaction (see Two Clinton Sq. Corp. v Rosoff, 59 AD2d 651; Two Clinton Sq. Corp. v Computerized Recovery Systems, 63 AD2d 852; Two Clinton Sq. Corp. v Computerized Recovery Systems, 84 AD2d 911; Two Clinton Sq. Corp. v Computerized Recovery Systems, 86 AD2d 786). This action was commenced in June, 1981 against defendants…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scheuer v. ScheuerNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- 509 Sixth Avenue Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Sachs v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Varga v. Credit-SuisseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
- VanMinos v. MerkleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- DeWeerth v. BaldingerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Sharma v. Skaarup Ship Management Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation v. LubellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- L. Magarian & Co. v. Timberland Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Teltronics Services, Inc. v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.