Legal Opinion

Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation v. Lubell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 1990PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wallach, J.

The action is one to recover a chattel pursuant to CPLR article 71, often referred to as "replevin” (see, Siegel, NY Prac § 337, at 411). It is brought by a museum and involves a watercolor painting, or gouache, claimed to be worth $200,000, and done by Marc Chagall in 1912 as a study for his oil painting of the same subject entitled Le Marchand de Bestiaux (The Cattle Dealer). The complaint alleges that the gouache was stolen from plaintiff in the mid-1960’s by a person or persons unknown; that plaintiff learned of defendant’s possession of the gouache in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. General Stencils, Inc. v. ChiappaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Sporn v. MCA Records, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Austin v. Board of Higher EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. Marcus v. Village of MamaroneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. Gillet v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Guggenheim Foundation v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Chen v. New Trend Apparel, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Zuckerman v. The Metropolitan Museum of ArtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  4. Peters v. Sotheby's Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Bakalar v. VavraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API