Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Chapin

District Court, D. Montana

Decided August 1, 1966No. Civ. 1296PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, District Judge.

This action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien 1 was commenced in the state court and removed 2 to this court by the Small Business Administration, hereinafter called SBA, an agency of the United States.

In May, June and July, 1963, plaintiffs’ predecessor performed work and furnished material for a log building erected on a tract of land owned by Dee Chapin. Chapin failed to pay an amount of $849.00. Within ninety days after the last item of work was performed and on August 23, 1963, a notice of lien was filed. The validity of the lien is not challenged, and as of August…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Rankin v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ault v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1968
  2. Beck v. HansonMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bolf v. BerklichDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1975
  4. Dck Worldwide Holdings Inc. v. CH SP Acquisition LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hayden v. PrevatteDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API