Legal Opinion

Tiger v. Wildman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1926No. 16234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THOMPSON, C.

This action was originally commenced in the district court of Creek county by Ada Tiger, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against Sarah A. Wildman, defendant in error, and others, defendants below, in ejectment, to recover an undivided one-fifth interest in the northeast quarter of section 7. township 18, in range 8, east of the Indian basé and meridian, in Creek county, Okla., together with damages for unlawfully withholding possession thereof, and for costs. Parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as they appeared in the lower court.

The cause was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Woodward v. De GraffenriedSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Tiger v. DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Barnett v. WaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Ross v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  2. Tiger v. FraileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Tiger v. HensleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Tiger v. PritchettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Tiger v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API