Legal Opinion

Tiger v. Hensley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1926No. 16235PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This action was originally commenced in the district court of Creek county, Okla., by Ada Tiger, plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, against W. E. Hensley et al., defendants in error, defendants below, to recover an undivided one-fifth interest in lands in Creek county, Okla., described in the petition, together with damages for unlawfully withholding possession thereof.

This cause was tried upon the same evidence as cause No. 16234, Tiger v. Wildman, 116 Okla. 171, 244 P. 29, this day decided by this court. The issues made up by the pleadings and decisive facts in this case are the same as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tiger v. WildmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Tiger v. FraileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tiger v. FraileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API