Legal Opinion
Heimanson v. Meade
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 27, 1976No. 52222, 52260PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Webb, Judge.
1. In Case No. 52222 the defendant Heimanson appeals from summary judgment against him based on a balance due on a promissory note executed by him to Meade. Following that appeal, Meade requested and obtained in the trial court an order requiring Heimanson to post a supersedeas bond, and Case No. 52260 represents the appeal from the latter judgment. After both cases were docketed in this court Meade moved for the grant of supersedeas by this court and abandoned the motion which he had filed in the trial court. This court by order dated April 28, 1976, granted supersedeas under the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Woolfolk Chemical Works, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Henderson v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bradley v. Tattnall BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Thomasson v. Pineco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Colodny v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Huckaby v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Crisp v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.