Legal Opinion
Heimanson v. Meade
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 27, 1976No. 52222, 52260Published
1Opinion of the Court
140 Ga. App. 534 (1976)
231 S.E.2d 373
HEIMANSON
v.
MEADE (two cases).
52222, 52260.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Submitted May 24, 1976.
Decided October 27, 1976.
Rehearing Denied November 24, 1976.
Neil L. Heimanson, pro se.
Smith, Harman, Asbill, Roach & Nellis, Richard D. Elliott, for appellee.
WEBB, Judge.
1. In Case No. 52222 the defendant Heimanson appeals from summary judgment against him based on a balance due on a promissory note executed by him to Meade. Following that appeal, Meade requested and obtained in the trial court an order requiring Heimanson to post a supersedeas bond, and Case No.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Joyner v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Crutcher v. Crawford Land Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Studstill v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.