Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. Perry

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 2002No. 2001-SC-0215-DGPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERT, Chief Justice.

The use of highly compensated, learned professionals as expert witnesses in complex litigation has become axiomatic. Many cases become reduced to a “battle of experts” and parties who enter the fray understand from the outset that the qualifications and testimonial persuasiveness of their experts will be indicative of the outcome. 1 As such, desirable persons willing to serve as expert witnesses are able to command substantial fees, often in excess of their level of compensation as practitioners of their professions. Some even devote more time and effort to their expert…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Weisgram v. Marley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Springer v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. OverstreetKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Miller ex rel. Monticello Banking Co. v. Marymount Medical CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bayless v. BoyerKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Primm v. IsaacKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kemper v. GordonKentucky Supreme Court · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API