Legal Opinion
Brennick v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided March 19, 1991No. File 360700PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtHammer, J.
The plaintiffs have taken this appeal from a decision of the defendant planning and zoning commission of the town of Newington (commission) rezoning a 17.9 acre parcel of land on the eastern side of Kitts Lane in Newington, owned by the defendants Clifford F. Stamm and Newell A. Stamm, from Business Berlin Turnpike (B-BT) to Planned Development (PD). The plaintiffs have also appealed the commission’s decision to grant a special exception permitting the Stamms to build four high-rise residential apartment buildings pursuant to the zoning regulations for PD zones.
As stated in their brief, the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Smith v. Planning & Zoning Board of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Holmdel Builders Ass'n v. Township of HolmdelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Blaker v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Stiles v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- East Coast Invest. v. Zoning Comm'n, No. Cv91 283293s (Oct. 15, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992