Legal Opinion

East Coast Invest. v. Zoning Comm'n, No. Cv91 283293s (Oct. 15, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 15, 1992No. CV91 283293SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The plaintiff appeals from the decision of the Zoning Commission of the City of Bridgeport denying its petition for a change of zone from Residence A to Design Business District #1 and for a special permit pursuant to Chapter 11A, Sec. 5 of the Bridgeport zoning regulations to construct a two story residence apartment building with 105 units on property at 1290-1320-1370 Chopsey Hill Road in Bridgeport. The plaintiff claims the decision was arbitrary and unreasonable, unsupported by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Feinson v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. DeMaria v. Enfield Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. Daughters of St. Paul, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Parks v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API