Legal Opinion

Ward v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided November 18, 1998No. CA CR 98-374PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

Danny Lee Ward appeals from his convictions of theft by receiving a firearm and possession of a firearm by a felon, for which he was sentenced as a habitual offender to fifteen and ten years, respectively, in the Arkansas Department of Correction. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motions for directed verdicts of acquittal because neither of the items in question met the statutory definition of a “firearm.” We affirm.

A motion for a directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. Killian v. State, 60 Ark. App. 127, 959 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Killian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Argo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Kelley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Slater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Curtis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API