Legal Opinion

Keanu v. Kaohi

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Exceptions erom Circuit Court, Second Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BT

FREAR, C.J.

• Ejectment for apanas 1 and 2, L. C. A. 2,572. Trial by the court, jury waived, on agreed facts. Judgment for plaintiff. Exceptions by defendants. •

The only question presented for our determination is whether under the will of one Manuel Svlva, admitted to probate in 1874, his widow, Ohina, took a fee simple or only a life'estate. The plaintiff, daughter of the testator, claims on the theory that the widow, now dead, took only a life estate. The- defendants claim under the widow by descent on the theory that she took a fee simple.

The devise in question reads…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Branca v. MakuakaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Brown v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hemen v. KamakaiaHawaii Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Robinson v. AheongHawaii Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re RosenbledtHawaii Supreme Court · 1918
  2. De Freitas v. CokeHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Paiko v. BoeynaemsHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  4. King v. Hawaiian Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API