Keanu v. Kaohi
Hawaii Supreme Court
Exceptions erom Circuit Court, Second Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BT
FREAR, C.J.
• Ejectment for apanas 1 and 2, L. C. A. 2,572. Trial by the court, jury waived, on agreed facts. Judgment for plaintiff. Exceptions by defendants. •
The only question presented for our determination is whether under the will of one Manuel Svlva, admitted to probate in 1874, his widow, Ohina, took a fee simple or only a life'estate. The plaintiff, daughter of the testator, claims on the theory that the widow, now dead, took only a life estate. The- defendants claim under the widow by descent on the theory that she took a fee simple.
The devise in question reads…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Branca v. MakuakaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1901
- Brown v. BrownHawaii Supreme Court · 1897
- Hemen v. KamakaiaHawaii Supreme Court · 1896
- Robinson v. AheongHawaii Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re RosenbledtHawaii Supreme Court · 1918
- De Freitas v. CokeHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
- Paiko v. BoeynaemsHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
- King v. Hawaiian Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1913