Scranton Stove Works v. Clark
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 71, Jan. T., 1916, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Luzerne Co., Jan. T., 1914, No. 8, in equity, awarding an injunction, in' case of Scranton Stove Works, a corporation, v. John B. Clark and H. Cora Clark, trading and doing business as Luzerne Manufacturing Company. Bill in equity to restrain unfair trade competition. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court awarded the injunction as prayed for in the bill. Defendants appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 71, Jan. T., 1916, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Luzerne Co., Jan. T., 1914, No. 8, in equity, awarding an injunction, in' case of Scranton Stove Works, a corporation, v. John B. Clark and H. Cora Clark, trading and doing business as Luzerne Manufacturing Company. Bill in equity to restrain unfair trade competition. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court awarded the injunction as prayed for in the bill. Defendants appealed. Errors assigned were in dismissing various exceptions' to findings of fact and law of the hearing judge and the decree of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
Plaintiff corporation is engaged in the manufacture of stoves and ranges in the City of Scranton and for a period of many years has manufactured and sold stoves of a certain design in connection with which it has used .the name “Dockash,” “Wyoming Dockash” and other trade names, all of them having been registered as trademarks and continuously used by plaintiff in connection *26with, the manufacture and sale of its wares. The names are stamped in full on the stoves and ranges in plain letters, but abbreviated on certain smaller parts.
In 1905 defendants purchased the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Clay Manufacturing Co. v. American Clay Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Juan F. Portuondo Cigar Manufacturing Co. v. Vicente Portuondo Cigar Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- E. T. Fraim Lock Co. v. ShimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Suburban Press v. Philadelphia Suburban Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Appeal of PrattSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
3Cited by12 opinions
- Thomson-Porcelite Co. v. HaradSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Stroehmann Bros. Co. v. Manbeck B. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Consolidated Home Specialties Co. v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Pennsylvania Central Brewing Co. v. Anthracite Beer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- B. V. D. Co. v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.