Legal Opinion

Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. Ambrose

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1941No. 9701PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

This is another of that long and growing list of suits which have been filed in federal and state courts in Texas, to hold invalid, and cancel, orders of the Railroad Commission granting a Rule 37 exception drilling permit. As in the great majority of those cases, so many breaches have already been let into the rule by numerous exceptions to it, granted to the complainants and the complained against in the suit, that though not legally,1 the rule has almost practically, disappeared.

Also as found by the trial court, in view of the fact that there has been, and will…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Borden's Farm Products Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Gulf Land Co. v. Atlantic Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Thompson v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Railroad Commission v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Selby Oil & Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  2. Reynolds v. Ward Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Gant v. LowryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Railroad Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API