Legal Opinion
Binder v. Fruth
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 20, 1986No. 1 CA-CIV 8304PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Judge.
I. FACTS
Appellants Dale and Marion Fruth (Fruths or creditors) appeal from a probate court order denying their creditors’ claim. The claim arose out of a $10,000 loan which they made to Jean H. Burke in 1983. The indebtedness was secured by a deed of trust on a time share condominium located in Utah.
Burke died on March 9, 1984. After Burke’s death, the Fruths filed an unsecured creditors’ claim for $9,033.01 representing the amount due on the note, plus interest. Instead of paying the claim, the personal representative, appellee Christopher Binder, conveyed to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lemons v. Superior Court of Gila CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. SchwabArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Universal Investment Co. v. Sahara Motor Inn, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- In Re Estate of BrowningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Browning v. EikenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Lundy EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Manicom v. Citimortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Hogan v. Washington Mutual Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007