Sedona Private Property Owners Ass'n v. City of Sedona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
¶ 1 This case grows out of an attempt to control growth in the City of Sedona. A *127group called the Responsible Residents of the Red Rocks organized an initiative drive to enact what they called a “Sustainable Growth Ordinance.” The objective of the ordinance was to slow the rate of construction in Sedona to preserve the environment and manage growth.
¶2 The proposed ordinance limited the number of new building permits that could be issued annually to 70% of the average number of permits issued each year for the period between 1988 and 1995. It set forth criteria for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Thomas v. Daughters of Utah PioneersUtah Supreme Court · 1948
- Sandblom v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- City of Flagstaff v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- United Milk Producers v. CecilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bt Capital v. Td Service Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Forszt v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Arpaio v. Maricopa County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Bt Capital, LLC v. Td Service Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Burns v. ApscCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.