Legal Opinion

Wood v. Picillo

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 9, 1982No. 80-419-AppealPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERGER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court entered after trial without the intervention of a jury. Finding that the defendants created a public and private nuisance in maintaining a hazardous waste dump site on their Coventry farm, the trial justice enjoined further chemical disposal operations at the defendants’ property and ordered the defendants to finance cleanup and removal of the toxic wastes. The defendants now contend that the trial justice erred in finding the disposal operation to be a public and private nuisance. We strongly disagree.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Citizens for Preservation of Waterman Lake v. DavisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  2. Pucci v. AlgiereSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  3. Rose v. Standard Oil Co. of New York, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1936
  4. Braun v. IannottiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934
  5. Rose v. Socony-Vacuum Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hydro-Manufacturing, Inc. v. Kayser-Roth Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. Cox v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  3. State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  4. Branch v. Western Petroleum, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Violet v. PicilloDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API