Legal Opinion

Troy v. Tucker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1997No. COA96-663PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

The issue before this Court is whether the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from a voluntary dismissal is appealable.

Generally, there is no right to an appeal from an interlocutory order. Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E.2d 377, reh’g denied, 232 N.C. 744, 59 S.E.2d 429 (1950). An order is interlocutory if it is made during the pendency of an action and it does not dispose of the case but requires further action by the trial court in order to finally determine the rights of all the parties involved in the controversy. Id. A party may, however, appeal an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Whitehurst v. VIRGINIA DARE TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Moore v. PateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Pardue v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Alston v. Duke UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. In re E.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. State v. WilkersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Anderson ex rel. Jerome v. Town of AndrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API