State v. Schanus
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Schanus timely appealed his felony conviction. The state filed a notice of review after the time for appeal had expired, challenging a sentencing departure. Schanus moved to dismiss the notice of review and the state did not respond.
DECISION
The state may appeal from a sentence “according to the rules of criminal procedure!;.]” Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1986). Minn. R.Crim.P. 28.05, subd. 1(1), which governs sentencing appeals, requires that any appeal from a sentence be filed “within 90 days after judgment and sentencing.”
The state did not timely file…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Bolstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Waynewood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996