Kerran v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Chief Judge.
This proceeding is here on petition to review an order of the Federal Trade Commission. Petitioners Frank A. Ker-ran and Cameron A. Kerran, partners doing business under the trade name of Double Eagle Refining Company, at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, are engaged in the business of re-refining previously used lubricating oil, principally crankcase drainings collected at gasoline stations; packaging the re-refined oil in tin cans of the same general size, kind, and appearance as those used for packaging lubricating oil produced directly from virgin crude; and selling the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Koch v. Federal Trade CommmissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Wolf v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Globe Cardboard Novelty Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Royal Oil Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Double Eagle Lubricants, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Double Eagle Lubricants, Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Kerran v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959