Legal Opinion

Kerran v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 19, 1959No. 5850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Chief Judge.

This proceeding is here on petition to review an order of the Federal Trade Commission. Petitioners Frank A. Ker-ran and Cameron A. Kerran, partners doing business under the trade name of Double Eagle Refining Company, at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, are engaged in the business of re-refining previously used lubricating oil, principally crankcase drainings collected at gasoline stations; packaging the re-refined oil in tin cans of the same general size, kind, and appearance as those used for packaging lubricating oil produced directly from virgin crude; and selling the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Algoma Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Koch v. Federal Trade CommmissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  3. Wolf v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Globe Cardboard Novelty Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  5. Royal Oil Corp. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Double Eagle Lubricants, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  2. Double Eagle Lubricants, Incorporated v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  3. Kerran v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API