Legal Opinion

Reichart v. Wilhelm

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

.Appealfrom Cedar District Court. — Hon. J. D. Hielen, Judge. Action in equity by the creditors of -the estate of H. Wilhelm, deceased, against Mary J. Wilbelm, his widow, and O. O. Wilhelm, his son. The relief sought is the setting aside of certain alleged conveyances of ' land by the deceased to the defendants, and subjection of the property to the payment of the claims of the •plaintiffs. There were decrees for the plaintiffs, and the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

The two causes have been submitted to us upon the same abstracts and arguments, and both will be disposed of in one opinion. The actions, being in equity, are triable anew in this court, and are to be determined upon the preponderance of -the evidence, and the equitable rights of the parties, arising therein.

B. Wilhelm died intestate on the nineteenth day •of May, 1888. His estate was insolvent. The valid ■claims against the estate amounted to about two thousand dollars. The greater part of this sum will be lost *512to the creditors if the land in controversy should be held to be the property of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stiles v. BreedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Curry v. ColburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Johnson v. CraigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Jeppesen v. JeppesenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  5. Butts v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API