Legal Opinion

In Re the Contempt Finding Against Craig

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1990No. 48A02-8811-CR-439PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from the finding and sentencing of Pierre Craig (Craig), a witness, for contempt for refusal to answer questions in a criminal prosecution after being granted use immunity. Specifically, Craig is appealing his sentence of 270 days, representing 90 days for each refusal to answer three questions.

We reverse and remand for appropriate sentencing pursuant to the applicable law.

On May 31, 1988, Craig had been called to testify in the murder trial of Robert Johnson and Anthony Hamlet. Craig apparently refused to testify, invoking his Fifth Amendment privilege…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Marriage of Clark v. AtkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Andrews v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Srivastava v. Indianapolis Hebrew Congregation, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Davidson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. In Re GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Matter of CraigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Brandon Mockbee v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API