Legal Opinion

Davidson v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 10, 2005No. 50A03-0502-CR-76PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

James H. Davidson appeals the trial court's finding that he was in direct criminal contempt for refusing to sign the terms and conditions of his probation when a probation officer visited him in the county jail and then cursing the probation officer and the judge. Because the trial court did not have immediate and personal knowledge of Davidson's act, the trial court improperly found him to be in direct contempt. We therefore reverse and remand for indirect contempt proceedings.

Facts and Procedural History

On February 17, 2005, Marshall County Probation Officer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. LaGRANGE ETC. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hopping v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Stanton v. MurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Brown v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1853
  5. In Re the Contempt Hearing of NasserIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Warr v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Rice v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Mitchell Carroll v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Thomas v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API