Legal Opinion

United States v. Nicholas Camodeo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 25, 1967No. 28348_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMBARD, Chief Judge:

On October 7, 1966 we granted the motion of counsel appointed for appellant under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, for leave to withdraw on the ground that the appeal was frivolous, and we dismissed the appeal. 367 F.2d 146. The Supreme Court vacated our judgment on June 5, 1967 and remanded the case “for further consideration in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.” 387 U.S. 575, 87 S.Ct. 2070. We conclude that the affidavit accompanying counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw substantially complied with the requirements…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Camodeo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Nicholas CamodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tippett v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. United States v. KatzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API