Legal Opinion

United States v. Nicholas Camodeo

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided October 7, 1966No. 28348_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUMBARD, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the appellant, Anthony F. Marra, Esq., and Joshua N. Koplovitz, Esq., attorneys of the Legal Aid Society, who have been assigned by this Court, under the Criminal Justice Act, to repre sent the appellant on his appeal from conviction for selling heroin on two occasions, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 and 174, petition for leave to withdraw on the ground that they are “unable to discover any error which can seriously be urged as a basis for reversal of the conviction.” As the appellant suggests no good reason to the contrary, and as counsel has fully advised…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. Edward Pravato, Joseph Sullivan, Joseph Dellamura and Barbara Ann McIvorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Robert Louis Porter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Charles P. Rumph v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Nicholas CamodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  2. People v. MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API