Lopez v. Payne
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. J. Hill, County Counsel, and Edward T. Bishop, assistant County Counsel, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Plaintiff prosecuted this proceeding to obtain a writ of mandate to compel defendant county auditor to issue to him a warrant upon the treasury of the county of Los Angeles for the sum of $274.84, alleged to be due and owing to plaintiff for services rendered in his official capacity as constable of the township of San Fernando. Three members of the county Civil Service Commission were made parties defendant for the purpose of requiring them to make the necessary certificate that plaintiff was entitled to the compensation demanded. There was a demurrer and answer, and, after hearing had,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- People ex rel. Stratton v. OultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Anderson v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Norton v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Legerton v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holmgren v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Smith v. County EngineerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Kennelly v. LoweryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944