Legal Opinion

Smith v. County Engineer

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1968No. Civ. 8882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAZAR, J. pro tem. *

This ease arises by appeal from a judgment denying a writ of mandate sought to compel reinstatement after appellant’s dismissal from employment by the County of San Diego.

Facts

On July 12, 1965 (presumably under county civil service certification), by appointment by respondent county engineer, appellant commenced work as a Draftsman II in the San Diego County Engineering Department. The same date appel lant was directed to take and sign the oath required of all public employees by the state Constitution, article XX, section 3. The circumstances require consideration of only…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. KempleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Vogel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Pockman v. LeonardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Searcy v. GrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Cohen v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brianna Bolden-Hardge v. California State ControllerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  2. Stamps v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Swaby v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Holmgren v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Bolden-Hardge v. Office of the CA State ControllerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API