Legal Opinion
Conklin v. Demastus
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 15, 1991No. 09A02-9002-CV-120PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Appellant-defendant William Conklin (Conklin) appeals the trial court's order setting aside a jury verdict in his favor and ordering a new trial, claiming that court failed to comply with Indiana Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 59(J)(7), and that the jury's verdict was not contrary to the law and the evidence.
We reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate the jury verdict and original judgment of the court.
FACTS
The facts which support the trial court's judgment show that on May 18, 1987, the plaintiff, Ernie Demastus (Demastus), was driving his automobile…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Memorial Hospital of South Bend, Inc. v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Bridgewater v. Economy Engineering Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- State Farm Life Ins. Co. v. SPIDEL ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court · 1964
- Coffel v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walker v. CuppettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Barnard v. HimesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kirchoff v. SelbyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Joseph Spaulding v. Joseph Cook (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Karl v. SteinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.