Legal Opinion
Fitzgerald v. Procunier
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 7, 1975No. C-74-1969-CBRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
RENFREW, District Judge.
Plaintiff, in custody at San Quentin State Prison, brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Director of the California Department of Corrections, the Warden of San Quentin State Prison, and the California Adult Authority. Plaintiff sought a declaration that his rights had been violated under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution, as well as injunctive relief designed to cure the effects of the alleged violations. This action comes before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss with respect…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sostre v. McGinnisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Eddie Adams v. Norman Carlson, Director of the Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- John Houston Sellars v. Raymond K. ProcunierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- John Furtado v. Harold Bishop, John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Fichtner v. Iowa State PenitentiarySupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Bricker v. Michigan Parole BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1975
- Toussaint v. RushenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.