Legal Opinion

Hammond v. City of Broken Bow

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1991No. 89-457PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Marvin Hammond, from a judgment entered in his favor and against the defendant, City of Broken Bow, following a bench trial. The plaintiff originally sought damages in excess of $10,000 for back wages. The trial court awarded him damages in the amount of $818.80, setting off $97.50 in costs, as the judgment was less than the defendant’s earlier offer of judgment. Broken Bow does not cross-appeal.

A suit under an employment contract is an action at law, and this court will overturn factual findings of the trial court only if they are clearly wrong. Brown v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. LangstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Foltz v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Coleman v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Fletcher v. MathewNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission v. State Employees Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. UrbanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Premium Farms v. County of HoltNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Unland v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hamilton v. HamiltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. EIKMEIER v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API