Foltz v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.
After judgment on a verdict in favor of Coen Construction Company (Coen) and Northwestern Bell Telephone Company (Bell), Jerome Foltz, as next friend of his son, Timothy, appeals from the district court for Platte County. We affirm.
For removal and salvage of the telephone lines and poles, Bell and Coen, on January 1, 1974, entered a written contract which, inter alia, included an indemnification agreement and provided:
4. ... Remove poles and associated hardware, backfill pole hole and dispose of old poles and wire.
18. The Company’s Representative will inspect all work and materials furnished…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kelly v. Diesel Construction Division of Carl A. Morse, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Atlantic Coast Dev. v. Napoleon SteelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Erickson v. Monarch Industries, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Stoutimore v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Lamb v. South Unit Jehovah's WitnessesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Kaiser Agricultural Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Anderson v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Long v. HackerNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Parrish v. Omaha Public Power DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.